A Study of Folk Beliefs in the Novel of Fig Tree of Temples

Document Type : پژوهشی اصیل

Author
Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Yadegare Imam Khomeini, Shahrerey, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Abstract:

Folk literature is an important tool for discovering the mechanisms of different nations' traditions, rituals, and customs in a social system that seeks to obtain sociological and anthropological data, and examine the elements of cultural identity throughout history. Hence, many folk themes can be studied in local literature, especially in the novel of fig tree temples. Therefore, the present study, borrowing a descriptive-analytical method, has investigated the elements and components of folk literature in this novel. The results indicate that Ahmad Mahmood sought to link the mythical roots with the popular beliefs in this novel, portraying the functions of novel's personalities versus nature. On another level, he has depicted the beliefs and superstitions of the southern people.















Keywords: Folk literature; fig tree of temples; tree worship; beliefs; superstitions.



Research Background

Many articles have been written in the field of tree planting, vegetation, and beliefs about it, among which the following can be mentioned: Aydanlow, Sajjad (2005) "The mythical theme of the plant's growth from the man and its reflection in Shahnameh and Persian literature"; Fazeli et al. (2013) "Cultural approach to plants and trees in mythology and literature"; Ansari et al. (2014) "Investigating and classifying the mythical idea of ​​the male tree in the folk tales of Hormozgan".



Aims, questions, assumptions

The purpose of this study is to explain the view of the marble vision of Ahvaz considering the elements of nature, especially the tree and the beliefs about it in the novel The Tree of the Temple of Figs, which are rooted in the myth of tree worship in ancient Iran. Therefore, the present study seeks to answer how nature has led to the formation of popular beliefs in this novel? What factors have influenced the formation of popular beliefs in this influential novel? Among the elements of nature, the tree has always been praised and sanctified by human beings due to its constant revival and the eternal forces it contains. Many factors such as customs, special the climate of Ahvaz, awareness of the future events, poverty, and ignorance in the form of public beliefs are significant in this novel.

Discussion

Climatic literature reflects the characteristics of a particular climate that, in the light of sociological studies, can provide important information such as beliefs, convictions, words, terms, songs, proverbs, climatic conditions, cover, etc. The climate literature seeks to provide a natural picture of the network within socialism in the literary texts, and seeks to explain as much as possible the relationship between man and nature and the impact of both sides on the environment. In this line of study, an author's stylistic discernment as well as the discovery of elements that distinguish a particular climate from other climates could be achieved. Ahmad Mahmoud, creating a tree called "Temple Fig" which is one of the native elements of the South, has rotated the characters of this novel around the axis of this tree and tries to explain their thoughts and actions in the nature. In this novel, he seeks to show tree worship and the beliefs about it. Thus, the novel contains many mythical concepts such as tree worship, tree planting, vows for it, and healing, as well as popular beliefs such as amulets, hanging dates, and shelter. In this novel, the horseshoe was set on fire, the votive offerings were given on Tuesday, and so on.

Honoring the fig tree of temples is so significant that people perform special rituals such as bowing to the tree, engaging in closing, and making vows to meet the needs of the tree. Because the tree is the symbol of revival, and some trees and plants have medicinal properties, some of the characters in this novel have been directed to the tree to cure disease. The novel refers to the "burial of the fetus under the fig tree of temples " which refers to the human plant or the kinship of man with the plant. Hanging a doll from a tree is one of the rain-worshiping rituals portrayed in this novel by women. In the ritual of rain, "a doll or a scarecrow or a person with a change of face is present. “Rain dolls are rooted in the Anahita myth, the goddess who has been revered and worshiped by the people of ancient Iran to the extent that many shrines and statues were built for these goddesses” (Zolfaqari,2016, p. 91).

Conclusion

Ahmad Mahmoud, in his novel The Fig Tree of Temples, refers to the man's inseparable relationship with nature, and therefore chooses the name of his novel from nature to double the man's attention to nature. Among the manifestations of nature, we can mention the "tree", about which many beliefs have been formed. The continual revival of the tree, its immortality, and its latent forces on the one hand, and man's inability to do so on the other, have led to the formation of sacred and ritual beliefs in different eras among the people, so much so that at a historical juncture, the tree and the manifestations of nature, as vegetative gods, were given serious attention by human beings, which can be observed in the novel The Fig Tree of Temples. The fig tree of temples, which is unique to desert cities and has an amazing growth, is considered as a prelude to entering the public beliefs of Ahvaz. It, then, depicts the various forms of tree worship that stem from the totemic connection of the man with the plant.

Most men and women engage in this behavior, which can lead to the groom standing on the roof of the hallway and the bride passing under it, the votive vow of Tuesday, the horseshoe in the fire, and the chanting. The author also mentioned carrying amulets, hanging donkeys, sheltering eyes, and so on. Factors influencing the formation of popular beliefs in this novel include culture, customs, beliefs, specific climate of Ahvaz, escapism, people's insight about nature, awareness of future conflicts, poverty, and ignorance.





References


Ansari, Z., Jamali, A & Zareei, B. (2014). Investigating and classifying the mythical idea of ​​the male tree in the folk tales of Hormozgan. Mystical and mythological literature, 10(36), 35-65.
Aydanlow, S. (2005). The mythical theme of the plant's growth from man and its reflection in Shahnameh and Persian literature. Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Mashhad. 15(13), 105-132.
Fazeli, F., Nikouei, A & Naqdi, E. (2013) Cultural approach to plants and trees in mythology and literature. Literature research, 7(23), 9-33.
Zolfaqari, H. (2016). Review and analysis of rain show and rain reading plays in the general literature of Iran (relying on shark tours and rain brides). Kohan Nameyeh Adabe Parsi, 7(4), 61- 99.
Keywords

Subjects


- آزادگان، جمشید(1392).تاریخ ادیان ابتدایی و قدیم. تهران: سمت.
- آشتیانی،جلال‌الدین(1377).تجزیه و تحلیل افکار عرفان بودیسم و جنیسم. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
-آموزگار، ژاله(1374).تاریخ اساطیری ایران. تهران: سمت.
- اسماعیل‌پور، ابوالقاسم(1391).اسطوره، بیان نمادین. تهران: سروش.
- افشاری، مهران(1387).تازه به تازه، نو به نو. با مقدّمه کتایون مزداپور. تهران: چشمه.
- الیاده، میرچا(1375).اسطوره، رویا و راز. ترجمه رویا منجّم. تهران: فکر روز.
- _______(1392).چشم اندازهای اسطوره. ترجمه جلال ستّاری. تهران: توس.
- _______(1393).تصاویر و نمادها. ترجمه محمّد کاظم مهاجری. تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب پارسه.
- _______(1394).رساله در تاریخ ادیان. ترجمه جلال ستّاری. تهران: سروش.
- انجوی شیرازی، سیّد ابوالقاسم(1371). گذری و نظری در فرهنگ مردم. تهران: اسپرک.
- انوشه، حسن(1375).دانش‌نامه ادب فارسی. تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، معاونت امور فرهنگی.
- بهار، مهرداد(1352).«درخت مقدّس». الفبا. ش1. ص 97- 93.
- تفضّلی، احمد(1378).تاریخ ادبیات پیش از اسلام. به‌کوشش ژاله آموزگار. تهران: سخن.
- جابز،گرترود(1395).سمبل‌ها. ترجمه محمّدرضا بقاپور. تهران: مترجم.
- جاهودا، گوستاو(1371).روان‌شناسی خرافات. ترجمه محمّد تقی براهنی. مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.
- جمال‌زاده، محمدعلی(1341).فرهنگ لغات عامیانه. به‌کوشش محمّد جعفر محجوب. تهران: فرهنگ ایران زمین.
- جهان‌شاهی افشار، علی و جهادی حسینی، سیّد امیر(1396).«جادو و جادوگری در قصّه امیر ارسلان نامدار». فرهنگ و ادبیات عامّه. ش 18. ص 130- 105.
-دوبوکور،مونیک(1391).رمزهای زنده جان. ترجمه جلال ستّاری. تهران: مرکز.
- دورکیم، امیل(1384).صور بنیانی حیات دینی. ترجمه باقر پرهام. تهران: مرکز.
- ذوالفقاری، حسن(1395).«بررسی و تحلیل نمایش‌های باران‌خواهی و باران‌خوانی در ادبیات عامّه ایران(با تکیه بر نمایش‌های کوسه‌گردی و عروس باران)». کهن‌نامه ادب پارسی پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. س 7. ش 4. ص 99- 61.
-_______(1397).زبان و ادبیات عامّه. تهران: سمت.
- رضی، هاشم(1381).دانش‌نامه اساطیر ایران باستان: عصر اوستایی تا پایان دوران ساسانی. تهران: سخن.
- روح‌الامینی، محمود(1374).زمینه فرهنگ‌شناسی. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
- ستّاری، جلال(1377).جهان‌شناسی اسطوره. تهران: مرکز.
- سرلو،خوان ادواردو(1392).فرهنگ نمادها. ترجمه مهرانگیز اوحدی. تهران: دستان.
- شعربافیان، حمیدرضا(1383).باورهای عامیانه در ایران. به گزارش سیّاحان غربی. تهران: محقق.
- شوالیه، ژان و گربران، آلن(1378).فرهنگ نمادها. ترجمه سودابه فضایلی. تهران: جیحون.
- صدقه،جان(1378).«درخت در اساطیر کهن». ترجمه محمّدرضا ترکی. شعر. ش26. ص 145-141.
- عطار نیشابوری، محمّدبن‌ابراهیم(1371).منطق‌‌الطیر(مقامات‌الطیور).تصحیح سیّد صادق گوهرین. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
- علی اکبری، نسرین و همکاران(1396).«باورها و عناصر ادبیات عامّه در رمان ورچم محمّدرضا همزه‌یی». جستارهای داستانی در ادب فارسی دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه. ش1. ص74- 57.
- علی‌پور سعدانی، رضا و شیخ‌زاده، مرجان(1388).«اشیای جادویی در فرهنگ عامّه ایران و ﺗﺄثیر آن در نقاشی مکتب سقاخانه». باغ نظر. س6. ش11. ص68- 53.
- فریزر، جیمز جورج(1394).شاخه زرّین، پژوهشی در جادو و دین. ترجمه کاظم فیروزمند. تهران: آگاه.
- کردی، رسول(1387).«باورهای عامیانه در دیوان خاقانی». آموزش زبان و ادب فارسی. ش2. ص37- 32.
- محجوب، محمّدجعفر(1387). ادبیات عامیّانه ایران(مجموعه مقاله‌هایی درباره افسانه‌ها و آداب و رسوم مردم ایران). به-کوشش حسن ذوالفقاری. تهران: چشمه.
- محمّدی، محمّد هادی و قایینی، زهره(1380).تاریخ ادبیات کودکان. تهران: چیستا.
- محمود،احمد(1379).درخت انجیر معابد. تهران: معین.
- معصوم شیرازی، محمّد(1345).طرایق‌ التحقیق. تصحیح محمّد جعفر محجوب. بی‌جا: کتاب‌فروشی باران.
- ناقد،خسرو(1376).«ایران‌شناسی در غرب، کتاب‌شناسی قصّه‌های مشدی گلین خانم(مارتسولف اولریش و امیر حسینی)». ایران‌شناسی. س9. ش3. ص 580- 570.
- وارینگ، فیلیپ(1371).فرهنگ خرافات. ترجمه احمد حجّاران. تهران: موفّق.
- هال، جیمز(1390).فرهنگ نگاره‌یی نمادها در هنر شرق و غرب. ترجمه رقیه بهزادی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
- هدایت، صادق(1387).فرهنگ عامیّانه مردم ایران. تهران: چشمه.
- همزه‌یی، محمّدرضا(1388). بررسی جامعه‌شناختی فرهنگ خوراک در ایران، در دورنمای گفتمان توسعه پایدار، کرمانشاه: دانشگاه رازی.