Narrative Structure of âBlack Foalâ Folk Tale: A Semiotic Approach
Document Type : پژوهشی اصیل
Authors
1
Faculty memberPayame Noor University
2
Payame Noor University
Abstract
Folk tales reflect the cultural identity of each nation and show the dominant ideology and context of that society. By adopting a semiotic research methodology to the analysis of literary discourse, the current study seeks to explore underlying structure of this tale taking into consideration discursive elements such as action and to become. Mutual interaction of these semiotic elements crystalized between prince and foal is considered a core element of ongoing changes in narrative chain. In this discursive regime, action feeds to become and meaning is achievable through the interrelation of sensation and perception. In addition, in this research, the authors have been explained different stages of promoting the material and spiritual capacity of the horse as an instinctive and material creature to the mythical and celestial actor namely the horse’s transcendence mechanism.
Keywords
Subjects
• Abbasi, A. & Mohamadi, M. (2001). Samad: The structure of a myth. Tehran: CHISTA. [In Persian].
• Adam, J. M & F. Zarvar (2006). L’ analyse des recite. Translated by: Hossein zadeh, A. & K. Shahparrad. Tehran: Qatreh.[ In Persian].
• Anscomber, J. Cl. Et Ducrot O., (1976). L' Argumoentation dans la langue, in language. Paris: Larousse.
• Bertrand, D. (1999). Precis de la semiotique litteraire. Paris: Nathan.
• Dehghan, M. (2011). “Analytical review of the Kashf al-Mahjub Hjvyry narrative structure modeled on narrative semiotics Greimas”. Matn-e-Pajoohesi-e-Adabi. No. 48. Pp 9-32. [In Persian].
• Grimas, A. J. (2009). De l'imperfection. Translated by: Shairi, H.R. First Edit. Tehran: ELM. [In Persian].
• HasanZadeh Mirali, A. & E. Kanani (2011). “The Study of Discursive Sign-Semantics’ Pattern of Gheisar Aminpour Poetry”. Adab-e- Erfani Research Journal. Vol. 5. No.2. Pp 115-136. [In Persian].
• Hedayat, S. (1991). Scattered writings. Tehran: AMIR KABIR.
• Karimi Firouz Jaei, A. (2017). “Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse”. Jostarhay-e-Zabani Two month Journal.Vol. 8. No. 6(41). Pp 327-351. . [In Persian].
• Koopa, F. et. al. (2016). “Common literature and an in-depth analysis of the position that religious and moral teachings have in some Chi Chi Ka of Hormozgan province”. Hormozgan Cultural Research Journal. No.11. [In Persian].
• Lintvelt, J. (2011). Essai de typologie narrative : le "point de vue" : theorie et analy. Translated by:Hejazi, N. & Abbasi, A. Tehran: Scientific & Cultural publishing. [In Persian].
• Moin, B. (2000). “Narrative Semantics”. Human Sciences Research Journal. No. 34. Pp 17- 132. [In Persian].
• Motahari, S.M. & Nazerzadeh Kermani, F. (2014). Narrative in Morshed & Margarita from the view point of Grimas Semiotics of Discourse. Research in Contemporary World Literature.Vol. 19. No.1. Pp 123-143. [In Persian].
• Montazerpanah, Z. (2012). “ The study of narrative structure in Masnavi stories from the view point of Grimas and Propp”. Qom: The university of literature and human science. [In Persian].
• Nasihat, N. et. al. (2012). “Semiotic analysis of structural narrative of “ Va matashaoon” Short Story” from the View point of Grimas”. Naqd-e- Adab-e- Moaser- Arabi Scientific & Cultural Journal. No.3. Year. 2.[In Persian].
• _____________. (2013). “Semiotic analysis of structural narrative of “ Hablon Kalvarid” Short Story”. Arabic Language & Literature of Iranian association Research Journal.No. 28. Pp 89-110. [In Persian].
• Savab, F. et. Al. (2015). “The Narrative Structure of Nezami’s Khosrow-va-Shirin”. Adab -e-Qanaee Research Journal. Sistan Balochestan University. No. 24. Pp. 37-58. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2002). Foundations of Modern Semantics. First Edit. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• _________. (2008). “From Structural Semiology until Semiotics of Discourse”. Naqd-e-Adabi. No.8. [In Persian].
• _________. (2016). Analyzes of Semiotics of Discourse. Fifth Edit. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Sharifnasab, M. (2017). “The moral meta-narrative and Iranian folktales” RavayatShenasi Season Research. Vol. 1.Year. 1.
• Vatanpour, A. & Namiriyan, K. (2012). “ The structure and mythical analyze of “Girl and Lotus” folktale”. Anthropology Researches. VOL.2. No. 1. Pp 167-187. [In Persian].
• Adam, J. M & F. Zarvar (2006). L’ analyse des recite. Translated by: Hossein zadeh, A. & K. Shahparrad. Tehran: Qatreh.[ In Persian].
• Anscomber, J. Cl. Et Ducrot O., (1976). L' Argumoentation dans la langue, in language. Paris: Larousse.
• Bertrand, D. (1999). Precis de la semiotique litteraire. Paris: Nathan.
• Dehghan, M. (2011). “Analytical review of the Kashf al-Mahjub Hjvyry narrative structure modeled on narrative semiotics Greimas”. Matn-e-Pajoohesi-e-Adabi. No. 48. Pp 9-32. [In Persian].
• Grimas, A. J. (2009). De l'imperfection. Translated by: Shairi, H.R. First Edit. Tehran: ELM. [In Persian].
• HasanZadeh Mirali, A. & E. Kanani (2011). “The Study of Discursive Sign-Semantics’ Pattern of Gheisar Aminpour Poetry”. Adab-e- Erfani Research Journal. Vol. 5. No.2. Pp 115-136. [In Persian].
• Hedayat, S. (1991). Scattered writings. Tehran: AMIR KABIR.
• Karimi Firouz Jaei, A. (2017). “Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse”. Jostarhay-e-Zabani Two month Journal.Vol. 8. No. 6(41). Pp 327-351. . [In Persian].
• Koopa, F. et. al. (2016). “Common literature and an in-depth analysis of the position that religious and moral teachings have in some Chi Chi Ka of Hormozgan province”. Hormozgan Cultural Research Journal. No.11. [In Persian].
• Lintvelt, J. (2011). Essai de typologie narrative : le "point de vue" : theorie et analy. Translated by:Hejazi, N. & Abbasi, A. Tehran: Scientific & Cultural publishing. [In Persian].
• Moin, B. (2000). “Narrative Semantics”. Human Sciences Research Journal. No. 34. Pp 17- 132. [In Persian].
• Motahari, S.M. & Nazerzadeh Kermani, F. (2014). Narrative in Morshed & Margarita from the view point of Grimas Semiotics of Discourse. Research in Contemporary World Literature.Vol. 19. No.1. Pp 123-143. [In Persian].
• Montazerpanah, Z. (2012). “ The study of narrative structure in Masnavi stories from the view point of Grimas and Propp”. Qom: The university of literature and human science. [In Persian].
• Nasihat, N. et. al. (2012). “Semiotic analysis of structural narrative of “ Va matashaoon” Short Story” from the View point of Grimas”. Naqd-e- Adab-e- Moaser- Arabi Scientific & Cultural Journal. No.3. Year. 2.[In Persian].
• _____________. (2013). “Semiotic analysis of structural narrative of “ Hablon Kalvarid” Short Story”. Arabic Language & Literature of Iranian association Research Journal.No. 28. Pp 89-110. [In Persian].
• Savab, F. et. Al. (2015). “The Narrative Structure of Nezami’s Khosrow-va-Shirin”. Adab -e-Qanaee Research Journal. Sistan Balochestan University. No. 24. Pp. 37-58. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2002). Foundations of Modern Semantics. First Edit. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• _________. (2008). “From Structural Semiology until Semiotics of Discourse”. Naqd-e-Adabi. No.8. [In Persian].
• _________. (2016). Analyzes of Semiotics of Discourse. Fifth Edit. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Sharifnasab, M. (2017). “The moral meta-narrative and Iranian folktales” RavayatShenasi Season Research. Vol. 1.Year. 1.
• Vatanpour, A. & Namiriyan, K. (2012). “ The structure and mythical analyze of “Girl and Lotus” folktale”. Anthropology Researches. VOL.2. No. 1. Pp 167-187. [In Persian].
