Cignitivr Metaphore of Love in Persian, English and Turkish Proverbs

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Linguistics / Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran-Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics/ Tarbiat Modares University –Tehran –Iran. ( Corresponding Author)
3 Associate Professor of linguistics / SAMT Research Center / Tehran –Iran
Abstract
The present study deals with the conceptual metaphors of the domain of love in the mirror of the proverbs of three Persian, English and Turkish languages. Efforts have been made to extract and collect data from 15 sources languages. Some of these sources include the comprehensive Turkish-Turkish culture of Persian (Mohammad Kanar, 2005), proverbs of Azerbaijan (Habib Majidi Zolbeneen, 2010), Eul Susslerri (Mohammad Hassan Yousefi, 1998), the culture of proverbs (Henry Dividov, 2007) and the Proverbs (Ali Akbar Dehkhoda, 1363). Through search of sources, more than 10,000 proverbs were studied, of which we reached 203 proverbs in the field of love and 96 in the proverbs. Some of these entries were shared among the languages ​​and some were assigned to one language. Attempts were made to bring the most frequent failures in the three distinct languages ​​in the table. Along with the signs, the most frequent areas of origin were also identified and introduced to determine whether the speakers in these three languages ​​used more than their source and source of metaphorical expressions of love.
Keywords

Subjects


- AGİŞ, Fazıla Derya (2007). A comparative Cognitive Pragmatic Approach to the Judeo-Spanish and Turkish Proverbs and Idioms that Express Emotions. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences English Linguistics. Master‟s Thesis, Ankara.
- Barcelona, Antonio (2001). “On the Systematic Contrastive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors: Case Studiesand Proposed Methodology”. eds.M. Pütz & et al. AppliedCognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 117-146.-
- Coinnigh, M. M. (2013). "The heart of Irish-language proverbs: a linguo-stylistic analysis of explicit metaphor". Proverbium: Yearbook of international proverb scholarship. no.30. pp.113-150. United States.–
- Collis, H. (2009). “101 American English proverbs”. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.-
- Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics, an Introduction, Edinburg University Press-
- Evans, Vyvyan (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburg University Press-
- Geeraerts, Dirk (1997). Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford Clarendon Press.
- Kartal, N. (2000). Atasozleri ve Deyimler Sozlugu. Ankara: Inkilap,
- Kobia, M. J. (2016). “A conceptual metaphorical analysis of Swahili proverbs with reference to chicken metaphor”. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol. 4. No. 2.
- Kovecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors Metaphor of Anger, Pride, and Love: a Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: Jhon Benjamins Publishing Company
- Kovecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge university press.-
- ـــــــــــــــــــــ (2002). Metaphor, a Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ----------- (2003). “The scope of metaphor”. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective. by: Antonio Barcelona, Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 79-92.
- ------------ (2010). Metaphor and Culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica. 2, 2 (2010). Pp. 197-220-
- --------- (2014). “Conceptualizing Emotions: a Revised Cognitive Linguistic Perspective”. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics. No. 50(1). pp 15-28. faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
- Gurbanghulu, A. (2013). English-Azerbaijani Proverbial Dictionary. Trafford Publishing, United State of America
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things. the university of Chicago
- Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press-
- Lakoff, G. & et al., (1989). Master Metaphor List , at: http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf
- Lakoff, G. (1993). “the contemporary theory of metaphor”, ed.A. Ortony. metaphor and Thought. pp. 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Maalej, Z. (2004). “figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: an extended view of embodiment”. Metaphor and Symbol. NO.19(1). PP. 51-75-
- Pavpertova, Olga. (2014). "Corpus-based Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors of Happiness in Russian and English". Cognitive Explorations into Metaphor and Metonymy. Peter Lang edition. pP. 35-50
- Patowari, J. (2015). “A comparative analysis of emotion conceptual metaphor in English and Bangla”. Language in India. ISSN 1930-2940. Vol. 15. NO. 11.-
- Pirzad Mashak, S. & et al., (2012). “A comparative study on basic emotion conceptual metaphors in English and Persian literary texts”. International Education Studies. Vol. 5. No. 1. –
- Retová, D. (2008). Analysis of conceptual metaphors of selected emotions in Slovak language. [Diploma thesis]. – University of Comenius in Bratislava. Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics.-
- Riemer, Nick (2010). Introducing Semantics. Cambridge university press.
- Schroder, A. U. (2009). “Preferential metaphorical conceptualizations in everyday discourse about love in Brazilian and German speech communities”. Metaphor and Symbol. Vol.24. Iss.2. pp. 105-120.-
- Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language: theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 2.Cambridge, MIT Press.
- Türk dil kurumu, Atasözleri ve Deyimler Sözlüğü, at: http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_atasozleri&view=atasozleri
- White, G.M. (1987). “Proverbs and cultural models: an American psychology of problem solving”. cultural Models in Language and Thought. eds. Holland, D. & Naomi Quinn. Cambridge university press. Pp. 151-172
- Zolfaghari, H. & Hayat Ameri (2012). “Persian Proverbs: Definitions and Characteristics”. Journal of Islamic and Human Advanced Research 2. pp. 93-108.